Do you think this is too fast? Like maybe the player should usually get Cream to take off her dress on day 2/3 and Cream fully naked by maybe day 4/5. Or it's probably fine because this is a very optimized route to get her naked as quickly as possible and normal player who is playing blind should be closer to what I said (take of dress day 2/3, naked day 4/5)?
At the risk of getting myself into trouble speaking for someone else...It is a very optimized route. (And I think takes advantage of flaws in the code like things hat did not progress time be increments but "set to a certain time" or something like that...and there was no 23:00 cutoff, etc etc) Anyone coming in blind would never stumble across it, and even "experienced players" might not do certain things in the order, or the number of times, etc. etc. I would not say to change anything on that YET/just because of his quick play feedback. Consider them a Cream Speed Runner.
There's actually a reasonable amount of stuff behind that option...including, it seems (I will be looking for it in this playthrough/while testing) the elusive footjob.
Not intended to be a pressure...but you did ask about testing. Just contribootin. Small "constant" stream it is.
Nothing for you to concern yourself with, its not a bug or anything like that. It was more tipping the hat to Foxytails, who has a crafty "walkthrough" that streamlines a lot of things (In the older version)...and he used it in his first run through of your update...and I wa indicating that I was intentionally not to look at/review other things that you would skip by using the walkthrough...for thoroughness of testing.
Fair enough. I'm not complaining, it will make aspects of the testing runs easier without actively cheating...but it is, until I know its something that coders are aware of, something to report.
So...what i am hearing is....go buy a lottery ticket. I will keep testing. If I NEVER get anything else...then we need to find out what I did, because a couple times in a row is statistically likely...but at some point you enter the realm of relative impossibility in the values of chance in reality.
Fair. I was not sure whether all the new images, while included in the files, were "successfully"/completely integrated into the whole thing. How do you want to handle "reporting" image based feedback? Just keep doing it and you can ignore most and only comment back on something that is actually an issue?
Intentional it may be, but it does lose the pizazz if everything is blocked by the text. Like I may edit that image and just add 100pix of blank space just to see what its like.
You don't have to stroke my ego...I'm a hack when it comes to Photoshop...but it works, especially since the part I added is behind the menu/text box etc. I can add the same image size change and lengthen the legs on that image too...but I cannot promise to make a habit of it.
Are creams ears backwards in that shower photo? Also is it possible to add the option to hide the text box? I know some engines allow it but I don't know renpy or if it does, just a thought.
Do you think this is too fast? Like maybe the player should usually get Cream to take off her dress on day 2/3 and Cream fully naked by maybe day 4/5. Or it's probably fine because this is a very optimized route to get her naked as quickly as possible and normal player who is playing blind should be closer to what I said (take of dress day 2/3, naked day 4/5)?
I can confidently state that as a casual player of this game its highly likely you'll only get her undressed by day 4-5. There's so many variables available, most players will likely try and level up stuff like touch etc. instead of the more important RWC meter.
Your contribution to this great work of jacking a rabbit has been great, hats off to you
Fair. I was not sure whether all the new images, while included in the files, were "successfully"/completely integrated into the whole thing. How do you want to handle "reporting" image based feedback? Just keep doing it and you can ignore most and only comment back on something that is actually an issue?
If it's feedback on like an actual bug/error, I'll look throught it properly and determine the appropriate actions. Like the Cream showering leg cutoff or the Cream behind the textbox, those are fine.
But if it's more of like "in this event, you should add cream blah blah.png and here should be cream blah blah2.png" (not trying to be rude). Then, you can still give feedback, I might save it somewhere for future reference or someone could help keep track of those for me. Basically, those will be treated as low priority.
Intentional it may be, but it does lose the pizazz if everything is blocked by the text. Like I may edit that image and just add 100pix of blank space just to see what its like.
If it's feedback on like an actual bug/error, I'll look throught it properly and determine the appropriate actions. Like the Cream showering leg cutoff or the Cream behind the textbox, those are fine.
But if it's more of like "in this event, you should add cream blah blah.png and here should be cream blah blah2.png" (not trying to be rude). Then, you can still give feedback, I might save it somewhere for future reference or someone could help keep track of those for me. Basically, those will be treated as low priority.
I'll try changing her positions. If anything looks better, I'll include in the next update.
Hmm. I just tested it in the main build and dist. build, both properly align her to the bottom. Maybe try a fresh install of v0.3?
Also, here's the image that would need Cream's leg to be lengthen to be similar to the showering pic
This is why I ask. This is my first time being involved in something like this....I am flexible, just trying to find the balance.
Hmmm...this says there may be something more going on on my end if its working fine for you (and potentially everyone else) and just not me. Might also have bearing on my 7th circle of Jenga hell...I will purge and set up a fresh one and resume testing and get back to you.
Either way, IN CASE...I did edit the other image (Its already included where the first one is in your 0.3 version) so I present to thee...
Your "patch" sir!
Also...I was unaware of using H to hide the box, so that could solve the initial one in terms of the visual if the location was in fact that intentional.
This is why I ask. This is my first time being involved in something like this....I am flexible, just trying to find the balance.
Hmmm...this says there may be something more going on on my end if its working fine for you (and potentially everyone else) and just not me. Might also have bearing on my 7th circle of Jenga hell...I will purge and set up a fresh one and resume testing and get back to you.
Either way, IN CASE...I did edit the other image (Its already included where the first one is in your 0.3 version) so I present to thee... View attachment 4654406
Your "patch" sir!
Also...I was unaware of using H to hide the box, so that could solve the initial one in terms of the visual if the location was in fact that intentional.
Technically, being remake. But more focusing on fixing bugs, improving gameplay mechanics, and cosmetics. Adding new stories or events are technically not within the current scope. But may include in the future.
Technically, being remake. But more focusing on fixing bugs, improving gameplay mechanics, and cosmetics. Adding new stories or events are technically not within the current scope. But may include in the future.
Oh cuz in the current version you can only get so far on discovering the truth I was hoping it would get finished but it's okay and what about the other threesomes that are in development threesome with knuckles and the one with tails and is the dominant tails gonna still stay in it
Oh cuz in the current version you can only get so far on discovering the truth I was hoping it would get finished but it's okay and what about the other threesomes that are in development threesome with knuckles and the one with tails and is the dominant tails gonna still stay in it
Technically, being remake. But more focusing on fixing bugs, improving gameplay mechanics, and cosmetics. Adding new stories or events are technically not within the current scope. But may include in the future.
Hello, guys. All these discussion about BSC has finally force me to try my hands at remaking BSC. Been working on it for a couple days. Mostly simplifying some of the codes and making it easier for maintaining. Haven't actually touch much of the actual events though.
I did include some fixes that has been suggested here before. Like constant main music, making sure all activities in the city to actually pass the time, actually closing the mall at 1800 hours and etc. I also changed the default amount of time passed for an event from 2 hours to 30 minutes.
I've also added an option to use the new AI character sprites or stick with the old one in the Preferences. Currently, it only replaces the "cream dress ok eyes up" image since I just did it to try if it can work. If Shadow Word: Porn could send me the pictures, I'll put them in the next update.
I don't know how long I'll be developing this version of BSC. Probably not too long. I don't really have any intention of adding new stories/events since I'm not a writer. Maybe, maybe not. I'll probably just do some "fixing" here and there and that's it.
I do need some feedbacks and suggestions with what else to do with this "remake". I was thinking of overhauling the stats systems cause I feel like there is way too many stats to keep track of. Not sure. What do you guys think?
If this is on JoiPlay, sorry don't think I can help. I'm not familiar with JoiPlay. I just know people use it to play VNs that do not have android versions.
