- Feb 15, 2020
- 696
- 1,471
Why enjoy when you can complain?people just enjoy this beautiful game
Why enjoy when you can complain?people just enjoy this beautiful game
Mate, there are so many people on this site who don't understand what porn is, so classify games with complex stories as "porn games", simply because they have lewd scenes.If we were trying to make just a porn game, porn stories, films and games would be our sources of inspiration.
Our sources of inspiration are Mad Max, Fallout and other similar games, settings and movies.
It's not safe to assume anything of the sort. Quite the opposite, as a matter of fact.He's not an old fart at all, and considering how athletic he is it's safe to assume the MC is rather young.
I'm afraid to say that both, you and your gf, are incorrect.Hold your horses here, guys. I never said anything about that I dislike it. Just little bother, not much... And so far I know that Adult Visual Novel is just nice alternative to term "porn game". In most cases for sure. My GF will disagree with the nice description saying something like "Playing porn game again?"...
How the fuck is someone in their late thirties an "old fart"?It's not safe to assume anything of the sort. Quite the opposite, as a matter of fact.
He has a daughter in her early twenties.
Simple maths tells you (for a fact, not an assumption), that he's at least mid to late thirties (If he was 15-19 when he had the child), most likely early to mid fourties.
Exceptions. Rare ones too.Being athletic is not an accurate indicator of age. Everyone here can see easy RL examples of men in their 50's who are immeasurably more athletic than some 18 years olds out there.
I didn't say that they were.How the fuck is someone in their late thirties an "old fart"?
Nothing rare about it. Got to any gym, most days of the week and you'll see a 50+ year old guy working out on core, or cardio.Exceptions. Rare ones too.
Wrong. On both counts.Also, aS a MaTtEr Of faCt, you're objectively wrong about the porn. AVNs can not be porn but this is a porn game. A story-driven porn game, if that makes you feel better. If the sex was removed it would stop being porn, simple as that.
It's a porn game. According to the US legal precedent, "I know it when I see it".I didn't say that they were.Try reading and comprehending, it helps.
I simply disputed you incorrectly saying that he was "rather young" & proved that he could not be.
Late thirties, early fourties, is not rather young. It's distinctly middle aged.
You were wrong. Deal with it.
Wrong. On both counts.
This is not a porn game & I am objectively, dictionary defined, correct about what constitutes porn.
If you take the sex out of this game, the story would still make sense and be of interest = it's not porn.
You are the only person who is "objectively wrong" here. Look up the meaning of the word, before you attempt to talk about it.
It helps when you understand the words you use.
You were wrong. Deal with it.
My comment was directed at someone saying that the MC is an old fart, you decided to disagree out of your own accord. He is not 18, surely, but for a species that lives up to their nineties, late thirties and early forties is in fact rather young, middle-age or not.I didn't say that they were.
I simply disputed you incorrectly saying that he was "rather young." Because he's not.
Late thirties, early fourties, is not rather young. It's distinctly middle aged.
Again you're acting as if the story makes the existence of porn in the game stop being a reality, but that's easily disproven. For your affirmation to be real, there can be no "pointless sex" (porn for the sake of porn) at all, it should all be part of the plot and even then not essential to the point of being removable with no considerable loss. That's not true, and there are many scenes that prove you wrong with more to come: Ain's Massage, Fairy in the Basement and Chilling With the Daughters in the Living Room.Wrong. On both counts.
This is not a porn game & I am objectively, dictionary defined, correct about what constitutes porn.
If you take the sex out of this game, the story would still make sense and be of interest = it's not porn.
You are the only person who is "objectively wrong" here. Look up the meaning of the word, before you attempt to talk about it.
It helps when you understand the words you use.
Again, stop trying to make an argument from nothing. You were wrong. Deal with it.
And if anyone needed any more evidence that "objectively, dictionary defined, correct" means shit, this comment solved the problem.You see, I think that calling it porn does belittle the work produced.
Porn is something where the plot is utterly irrelevant and is only there to serve as a vehicle to take you to the next sexually explicit scene.
If you were a game creator who spent time and effort creating his world and story, you don't think you'd be offended to have your work effectively called "mindless, plotless, purposeless rutting"?
No, it's not.My comment was directed at someone saying that the MC is an old fart, you decided to disagree out of your own accord. He is not 18, surely, but for a species that lives up to their nineties, late thirties and early forties is in fact rather young, middle-age or not.
I did not once say that the story makes the lewd scenes no longer exist.Again you're acting as if the story makes the existence of porn in the game stop being a reality, but that's easily disproven. For your affirmation to be real, there can be no "pointless sex" (porn for the sake of porn) at all, it should all be part of the plot and even then not essential to the point of being removable with no considerable loss. That's not true, and there are many scenes that prove you wrong with more to come: Ain's Massage, Fairy in the Basement and Chilling With the Daughters in the Living Room.
No. It's to entertain the fact that the game is not a porn game.That's all to entertain the idea that porn is not a big deal in this game when it literally has a gallery with all the sex scenes.
Read the dictionary, you are clearly & sadly lacking in education of the term's definition.And if anyone needed any more evidence that "objectively, dictionary defined, correct" means shit, this comment solved the problem.
Pornography (often shortened to porn, or porno) is the portrayal ofYou must be registered to see the linkssubject matter for the exclusive purpose ofYou must be registered to see the links.You must be registered to see the linksA distinction could be drawn between uncensored explicit or hardcore erotic art, and pornography.
ok thanks for the reply will try another run through later and see if it works. Right now I think I am stuck, or game is at end after I get fairy and she is in basement without spoiling game for anyone.I think you got it. This is pretty much how I remember it.
Besides the things you mentioned Didja follow Ivy to the bunker and go to town and take a walk with your niece? Did you talk to all of your family and exhaust the subjects? If so you're probably at the end of all the content til next updateok thanks for the reply will try another run through later and see if it works. Right now I think I am stuck, or game is at end after I get fairy and she is in basement without spoiling game for anyone.You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Actually, it's not. In the current decade the average human lifespan is 70-90 with more people living past 100...Late thirties, early fourties, is not rather young. It's distinctly middle aged.
..
Splitting the average age for males doesn't cut it. Forties is never considered middle-age. Look it up.Actually, it is.
The 2020 global average human life span was 78.7 years old, for men.
Half of that is 39.35.
As I said: "Late thirties, early fourties is distinctly middle aged", but I'll change "distinctly", to "precisely".
Yes it does & yes it is.Splitting the average age for males doesn't cut it. Forties is never considered middle-age. Look it up.
You're arguing semantics. Fourties haven't been considered middle age for a very long time. And those statistics you quote are not always accurate globally. Many more people are living longer these days with more people living over 100. In common terminology fourties are never considered middle-age.Yes it does & yes it is.
I did look up the information, but I initially used only UK information, where the age range I gave is precisely middle aged.
You clearly did not. Your averages were way off.
The 2020 global average human life span was 72.81 years old, for men.
Half of that is 36.405.
You must be registered to see the linksreport it as now being 37.
You must be registered to see the linksdefine it as 40-60.
It's clearly not me who needs to "look it up".
If you say so. I've lived long enough to know that no one considers 40 middle-aged.Of course, you're obviously right & everyone else on the planet is wrong. Of course.
Go ahead and ask a bunch of 37-40yo's if they consider themselves middle-aged. Maybe look up proper nomenclature. Furthermore, anyone can edit a wiki page, that doesn't make them right.Well that statement is quite obviously incorrect, as you're talking to one person who has always known it to be such & everyone that I know shares the same view. When I turned 40 a good number of people remarked on me being middle aged.
Wikipedia is produced by the public, so obviously enough people consider fourties to be middle aged for them to define it as such.
Men's Health took a more literal approach & defined it as now being 37, from a public survey.
Collins dictionary also define it as beginning at 40.
But yeah, obviously you're correct & no-one considers it such.
Can someone really be so obtuse?
Good luck trying to apply simplistic math to society's perceptions about common terminology. And if I wasn't worth the time then you wouldn't bother to continue arguing. But keep going, I have all night.Again, stupid response.
Of course someone who is just turning middle aged will not consider themself such.
That doesn't alter the fact that they are.
I have provided numerous reputable sources & you're arguing with them, as well as with someone who is in their fourties.
Seriously now, go away. You're not worth the time.
You're trying to argue with facts.
Good luck with that.
And yet you keep replying. Did you want to be friends? Thanks for your interest in my social calander, I'll see if I can fit you in.You're behaving like a moron & you have nothing as a valid argument, that's why it's boring now.
You're clueless & lonely, I get it.
Try not arguing with facts, you might end up with some friends.
Yes, because you know what society's perceptions are, better than a major international magazine, better than wikipedia, better than the dictionary. Of course you do. You're special.
This is now tom hardy in the mad max fantasy, but bearded mel gibson is great also.And yet you keep replying. Did you want to be friends? Thanks for your interest in my social calander, I'll see if I can fit you in.