- Mar 23, 2019
- 769
- 1,173
That's the thing, the chivalrous pirates we see in movies and games are an exception. They only appear to be the majority because they're getting the most screen time. Meanwhile, in games, we're killing hordes of nameless bad pirates.
These chivalrous pirates are interesting because of the contradiction of them "stealing for the right reasons", like Robin Hood. This contradiction only works when 99.9% of pirates are ruthless killers.
And, just looking at it from a practical point of view... How would Kira and Pearl even know who to attack? They say they rarely visit pirate island or even go ashore, so where are they getting their information from? What kind of information network would they need to consistently pick out valid targets? For that matter, wouldn't most smuggling be done by merchant ships, with only a few of the crew in the know?
Even in video games there are tons and I mean tons of examples of good friendly pirates that ally with the mc. Pirates are only ever bad when we need a bunch of faceless enemies to fight. Also irl pirates during the golden age of piracy weren't killers either. Blackbeard literally never killed anyone until they tried to arrest him. Pirates mostly tried to blue unarmed merchants into handing over their stuff. Same tactics as the common mugger. Pirates rarely actually fought any battles because they didn't want to get killed. I've got a weapon and you don't so hand over your stuff and we'll leave. And where was it mentioned they never go to the bay or go to shore?
1000% disagree. Their perspective is the only thing that matters when we're judge their character. It's the entire reason why characters are given an out whenever they do stuff like this. Bad guy is bad by circumstances and not by choice thing or whatever. Standard trope. Kira clearly thought the mc was going to be fine so there is no sense in trying to act as if she was willingly going to let him be murdered. We're not talking about whether or not what you think did was right or wrong And we already know Kira and Pearl had no idea about Eliza or even what the MC was looking.Their perspective does not matter. What matters to the MC is that this trip has taken a valuable week with Eliza stuck in bed. Their father isn't inviting the MC over for coffee, he clearly wants whatever the MC is looking for. He caught wind of their destination, and the adventurer's guild involvement, and wants to gauge if whatever the MC is looking for would be useful to him.
Kira's betrayal is only that she lied to the mc in her head. She clearly never thought he was in danger. So I want to know why Kira's "betrayal" is somehow worse or even on par with Pearl. One is way worse than the other.
And they didn't beg their father to be lenient. It says that Pearl kept praising the mc and saying that she shouldn't kill him. Kira was under the impression that as long as Mc doesn't try to make blackheart mad he'll be fine.
Oh yeah, so far for being chivalrous pirates, right? Stealing valuable treasure from someone who's going to an island nobody ever returned from. What was that about only stealing from people who deserved it?
Do you not think there is a difference between literally robbing a person and trying to make it to some fabled treasure first?