- Mar 24, 2021
- 2,818
- 4,387
there are also her innate abilities and nergal's blessing that changed her from a half-elf to a succubusIf you want to think that fine. I think she needs something extra. Again, agree to disagree
there are also her innate abilities and nergal's blessing that changed her from a half-elf to a succubusIf you want to think that fine. I think she needs something extra. Again, agree to disagree
This is exactly what I just said. This is describing their role in the story. It's not saying that it's an ability monster girls have."Historically, media has depicted monstrous women as villains, or if not, then less monstrous than males of equivalent ability."
"The trope is historically used strictly negatively and antagonistically as a representation of an ugly, cruel, or deceitful woman; such incarnations often have the woman hide her monstrous traits to deceive others"
Then this part is just saying monster girls look less monstrous than males of the same species in most cases. Example, Frankenstein's monster vs his bride.or if not, then less monstrous than males of equivalent ability."
it is enough when said deeption is said monster girl's inate ability..Just that they were often villains trying to trick the protagonist into letting their guard down, and they reveal their true apperance. It's not saying that being a deceitful villain is enough to make a person a monster girl.
She has an almost nun-like vibe IMO so mabey it's a disguise? She also could be morning Roderick which would be interesting.her vidow veil ontrigues me, is she mourning Roderick or is that just her disguise?
It doesn't say anything about deception being their ability. Read what it actually saysit is enough when said deeption is said monster girl's inate ability..
but going back to the orcs... the orcs in PQ are nothing but monsters so, since she'd be sharing visual characteristics with th em, a she-orc would be a monster girl.
I dont know who is she. Like you said, should be CathCould this be the infamous Cath? Nice to put a face to the name at last!
that's the mimicry i mentioned earlierhide her monstrous traits to deceive others"
it's just a noblewoman's cloack, her dress has a nice cleavageShe has an almost nun-like vibe IMO so mabey it's a disguise?
it will certainly be an interesting encounterShe also could be morning Roderick which would be interesting.
"Historically, media has depicted monstrous women as villains, or if not, then less monstrous than males of equivalent abilityShow me where it used the word ability.
So, you're arguing that they have less ability? Notice that this doesn't mention anything about deception. Like I said earlier it's saying that they look less monstrous than males of the same type. It's not saying they have abilities. You're trying to combine two different sentences with two different meanings to try to make your argument."Historically, media has depicted monstrous women as villains, or if not, then less monstrous than males of equivalent ability
you say that monster girls have visual traits in common with monsters, I'm simply referencing what makes a onster...from the monster article :They may or may not have supernatural powers, but are usually capable of killing or causing some form of destruction, threatening the social or moral order of the human world in the process.So, you're arguing that they have less ability? Notice that this doesn't mention anything about deception. Like I said earlier it's saying that they look less monstrous than males of the same type. It's not saying they have abilities. You're trying to combine two different sentences with two different meanings to try to make your argument.
If you acknowledge that it's about visual traits, why are you mentioning ability? You're still trying to tie into the idea that it's a monster who is a girl instead of a monstrous girl.you say that monster girls have visual traits in common with monsters, I'm simply referencing what makes a onster...from the monster article :They may or may not have supernatural powers, but are usually capable of killing or causing some form of destruction, threatening the social or moral order of the human world in the process.
storm1051787 let's dial it back.. look at this chart and tell me at what stage it becomes a monster girl..
View attachment 4572772
because to share visual traits with a monster saidmonster girl must be the female equivalent of a monsterIf you acknowledge that it's about visual traits, why are you mentioning ability? You're still trying to tie into the idea that it's a monster who is a girl instead of a monstrous girl.
wrong..as all those characteristics are animal and not monsrousStage 2.
what is your definition of a werewolf?That doesn't really make any sense, there could be multiple reasons for sharing visual traits. Unless they have the same origin they wouldn't be the same type of monster . Male and female members of a species could also have different traits due to sexual dimorphism.
It's not wrong, it's completely subjective what someone considers outwardly monstrous. Are werewolves not monsters now?
A human who can turn into either a wolf or a wolf human hybrid, often as a result of some curse and typically involuntarily.what is your definition of a werewolf?
and often voluntarly... have you seen the movie "dog soldiers" ? was the woman that lured the soldiers into the ottage a werewolf in human form or a human?and typically involuntarily.
even more, especially fantasy are about rolling with it and causing as much damage as possible..A lot of stories involving werewolves are about trying to fine ways to break the curse