- Jan 16, 2020
- 1,176
- 2,233
Stories without an antagonist don't really have much to dohe is the main antagonist in this game. Taking him out means that "our" bar is probably thriving and not struggling (no competition), and there goes half the story and a couple of the possible LIs. Stories without an antagonist don't really have much to do, so even if his ending made it seem like his character was unimportant I think he needed to be in there. And maybe the dumb ending for him was more that the writing had given him too much influence in the story and there was no other way to get rid of him without bad consequences for MC + friends that would have made the game ending a real downer. And hey, since he was given a soap-opera death, if they ever decide to do a 3rd game they can always bring back his "twin" brother!![]()
Did you not play the 1st game???
Taking him out means that "our" bar is probably thriving and not struggling (no competition)
The one person who actually cares about the bar storyline
The main conflict should be the relationship? Like SWM 1 doesnt even have a antagonist until act 3 but even then Emma actually adds to the conflict by her reasoning tying directly to the main thing us gooners are here for (the smut) and does it in a clever way by adding in the milfs relationship. Seb adds nothing other then Isla but even then Isla isn't even in much of the game.