You did not answer the question (which was a simple yes/no), but instead answered the questions you wanted asked.
Apparently, you didn't read my message carefully again, okay, it happens to me too. I don't mind reminding you once more.
The answer to your question is yes - he corrected almost all the major mistakes in the AI, as far as I noticed and know. What you posted are not mistakes (at most, subjective moments that you don't like), and I explained this to you in detail above, which you amusingly ignored.
Points 1 and 2 are not like 3 or 4 asses; they are permissible artistic techniques, etc. (read the detailed explanation above). The same goes for shadows, hands, etc.
Oh, and I just noticed the thing about the keyboard, but that's the funniest and most symptomatic part when someone with a smart expert face tries to nitpick at something. This is a common effect when an image/photo is mirrored. I dread to imagine how many similar
AI "flaws" you'll encounter in the real world.
There was no logical or common sense reason to put the update on hold... it could have brought in even greater revenue had they released something in those intervening months. They did not. The absence of said update makes for interesting interpretation.
They are finishing a version of Season 1 for Steam consideration (whatever they have determined that is)... they are not finishing the "Steam version of the complete overhaul of the project's seasons."
This is just a brilliant (not) piece of advice.
It's quite logical to end a new season of a show when your show has been pulled from TV channels, and you only have half the new season ready, right? Spending even more effort to show the new season in basements and on cheap VHS tapes, that's correct, isn't it?
The plan is to try to break through to a bigger stage if local moralists have closed the door on calmly continuing the story with the audience you've built up over many years.
Interesting interpretation - what do you mean by that?
Um, you don't know my experience in crafting, making, and art. In fact, for quite a few years in my past, I earned a living as a scenic designer, lead carpenter, and technical director on many theatrical productions.
This is literally what I was talking about.
I don't mean to offend people in traditional art, but it is very different from digital art. A significant portion of top digital artists lack formal education in this field for obvious reasons. What am I getting at? I assume you may just not realize the number of tools and techniques used by digital artists that would seem unfair to traditional artists, etc.
Perhaps it would have been "better to remain silent..." as you had for the past 3 years.
Either way, obviously you do not wish to look objectively. Enjoy your day.
I understand that I might not prove anything to anyone here. But why not? This is my field of work and knowledge. Maybe someone will find my posts interesting to read. I still unironically consider you a good person and a very hardworking and valuable contributor here, it's just that you are fueling hate (though I think I’ve read the opposite opinion about this here before, which is doubly amusing). And in my view, this hate is highly subjective, as I explained in great detail above.