The need for completion is a strange modern thing. I don’t get it at all, personally; life goes on forever, it doesn’t *end*, it simply moves on to new characters; so why should our stories have these weird, imposed notions of endings? The happily-ever-afters are stomach turning, but so are unsatisfactories, unanswered questions, etc.
In another world, Game of Thrones is still running, without the sabotage of an imposed ending, and virtually 100% of fans are far happier.
Some psychologists argue that happiness is having things to look forward to. A visit from your girlfriend, the birth of a grandchild, a Parisian vacation, that magazine subscription that delights you, the latest installment in the long-lasting series of novels.
In short, this is a story that *shouldn’t* end. There shouldn’t be an endpoint to it; there is no one story question that, once resolved, would leave the rest of the characters in some completed state. I hope to be delighted by new installments for the rest of my life.
I get what you’re saying, but I think you’re mixing up life with storytelling. Life’s all over the place, random, and doesn’t really have a clear ending until it does. But good stories are about SOMETHING and they have structure. They need a beginning, a middle, a climax, and an end (even the ancient Greeks knew that, so it's not a modern thing) Without an ending, it's just... things happening, and that’s not really a story. It’s like random events. In case of adults games: events pulled out of developer ass in the fly.
About that thing you said regarding GoT still going: I see what you mean, but honestly, if that show kept going, it would’ve just fallen apart even more than the last season did. People would’ve stopped watching, and it wouldn’t have had any direction. There had to be an end.
If you look at any classic story, it’s about resolving something, tying things up. Without an end, it’s not really satisfying. Stuff just falls apart, characters don't progress, there is no meaning and nothing matters anymore. And if a story just drags on without an end, it’s not a story anymore, it’s a soap opera.
Now, I’m not saying a story is worthless just because it doesn’t have an ending. Sometimes authors don’t finish or something happens. But that leaves you with this feeling of unfinished business. You know there’s something missing, and it’s frustrating. It’s still good, but without closure, it’s hard to feel fully satisfied. Long-running shows or books can be fun, but they tend to lose momentum. There’s a reason for that: they forget where they were going.
Sure, happy endings can be cheesy, but a good ending doesn’t have to be happy. It can be sad, bittersweet, or even open-ended. But it has to feel like it fits with what the characters have been through. If a story has no end, it loses its meaning. And there's no pay-off.
The best stories are the ones that end. Even if it's sad or unexpected, the closure makes it powerful.
So no, I don’t think it’s weird to want a story to end. I think it’s just a matter of respecting good storytelling.