All of which is fine, this game is not for everyone. But when the game clearly list in it's tags that it's TEXT BASED, that it contains TURN BASED COMBAT and MANAGEMENT, when in title you have RPGM listed as game engine then potential players should have an idea what to expect. Writing a negative review because game contains those elements speak more about reviewer then the game... which is why I believe all those reviews should be deleted due to not being relevant to the game.
Cool the 'tude, you are preaching to the choir here.
I agree with the fact that it's shitty practice to write reviews for products which you haven't given an honest attempt, and haven't attempted to comprehend the purpose of before using.
But I ask, how would you go about "deleting negative reviews" in a way that's objective, fair and doesn't provoke a tidal wave of people demanding the same treatment for other games on this site?
Where do you draw the line from "unfair negative review" to actual negative review? Does anyone who says "I played past half of chapter 1, and the scenes just weren't for me" count as deletable in your optics?
How much research does a person have to do to count as "valid" in your optics? The game says "2dcg RIGHT next to "text-based" in the tags list, and there are multiple attached images of sex scenes. Do you really blame some people for not getting the full understanding from that info?
Who would even manage deleting reviews, without pissing off this entire site, when thousands of people start getting mad and posting how their borderline-reviews got canned, because a moderator got too zealous in their purging?
You are evidently frustrated about those reviews. But this isn't a real solution.