VN Ren'Py Vulgar Reverie [v0.12] [Saxonado Studios]

4.80 star(s) 56 Votes
May 31, 2021
15
81
Mc x Ammie update is fine, Sax has to keep the uwu vanilla sex, muh reassurance with mc and ammie crowd happy.

Cause look at that brandon update that Sax had to revise cause these people meltdown when they dont get the reassurance that ammie loves the MC and she's doing it for him.
 

idkmanerally

Member
May 2, 2023
303
1,214
For where I'm concerned it's a shame, I self-insert and really can't appreciate a subby MC even if the FMC is awesome. I'm drawn to boundary breaking but there has to be a minimum I can sustainably identify with, otherwise I feel I'm just being denied the choices I would make, and it breaks the "illusion". Don't want to sound stubborn, it's just how it is, I don't feed on humiliation at all, at most it's something that can occasionally spice things up, but sustenance must come from feeling good about "my" (the MC's) role in the relationhisp.



I'm confused as it seems to contradict what turmio said above, but I can see how things may appear differently to different people. I may have to check it out but guarding myself against some unpleasantness.

There’s nothing wrong with trying different perspectives now and then, but forcing yourself to enjoy something that fundamentally goes against your preferences won’t necessarily make the experience better. I'm sorry if I nag too much in these discussions, but what other place to look for the nuance that game descriptions sometimes miss? If I were in the dev's position, I'd probably struggle with how to present the game, between promoting what's appealing to a particular audience and warning about what may deter others. You want reach as many people that can enjoy your work as possible, while avoiding the backlash of those who would feel "defrauded" - I won't be among the latter, which is why I end up discussing games BEFORE I play them... which comes with its own traps.

Just wanted to make sure the devs - if they read this - don't take me the wrong way. If our preferences don't align, there's nothing wrong about it. I suppose I *could* play a game for the sake of a good story, or a good character *other than* the MC, but maybe I'm just a simple guy, looking for simple rewards :p
this thing people do, where they come into game threads, and ask a million questions pretending to be interested in the game, and then start arguing with people about whether or not the game is good, or "for them", without just playing the fucking game - incredibly irritiating

just play it! or don't! why are you here spamming the thread expecting us to sell you on it!
 

SlapE

Well-Known Member
Dec 4, 2022
1,913
5,386
Sorry to tell you this there is no true strong route it's either mild humiliation or strong humiliation but the game is really good you won't regret it
For where I'm concerned it's a shame, I self-insert and really can't appreciate a subby MC even if the FMC is awesome. I'm drawn to boundary breaking but there has to be a minimum I can sustainably identify with, otherwise I feel I'm just being denied the choices I would make, and it breaks the "illusion". Don't want to sound stubborn, it's just how it is, I don't feed on humiliation at all, at most it's something that can occasionally spice things up, but sustenance must come from feeling good about "my" (the MC's) role in the relationhisp.

It's not mild humiliation or strong humiliation. The paths are more like:

Strong: Mostly passive but also somewhat confident.
Passive: fully passive, very little confidence, and mild humiliation involved.
Humiliation: fully passive and very little confidence, with strong humiliation and inferiority involved.

You would have been more correct in your assertion if you said there's no actual dom/assertive MC path.

Then there's also other kinks/sub-paths like interracial talk/raceplay and I believe a group sex one, if I'm remembering correctly.
 

reidanota

Active Member
Nov 1, 2021
529
381
this thing people do, where they come into game threads, and ask a million questions pretending to be interested in the game, and then start arguing with people about whether or not the game is good, or "for them", without just playing the fucking game - incredibly irritiating

just play it! or don't! why are you here spamming the thread expecting us to sell you on it!
I think I was quite reasonable in my approach, and don’t think anything in my post warrants the level of hostility in your response. I openly asked if the game aligned with my preferences, to which a few people responded; I didn't ask for validation of mine but acknowledged different perspectives as equally valid and even made it explicitly clear that I wasn't requesting/demanding the game be tailored to me. English is not my first language, so I tend to extend myself trying to be as self-aware as I can while discussing a game before playing it, to gauge whether it aligns with my tastes. I think it’s a normal, thoughtful way to engage in discussions about media and I sincerely apologise if my tone sounded critical, which wasn't my intent.

You, on the other hand, are reacting emotionally and aggressively, assuming false intention on my part. You seem to be projecting frustration and taking an entitled stance, acting as if you have the authority to decide who gets to participate in the conversation and in what way.

I did make it clear in previous posts what my stance was regarding power play, passive/active MC, etc. I disagreed with others on what we liked or didn't like without trying to impose my views and, from their reaction, I think we're still good, so your white-knighting is completely unwarranted. Let me be even more clear, I'm not engaged in any discussion about where the game should or shouldn't go. Games should always go where devs want them to go, and the real issue seems to be people being so invested in "promoting" THEIR own preference that they see any non-confrontational post that doesn't align with it as a threat.
 

HappyCrab

Newbie
Mar 16, 2022
51
184
Mc x Ammie update is fine, Sax has to keep the uwu vanilla sex, muh reassurance with mc and ammie crowd happy.

Cause look at that brandon update that Sax had to revise cause these people meltdown when they dont get the reassurance that ammie loves the MC and she's doing it for him.
Stop feeding into this notion that Saxo is pandering to the audience. They're sticking true to their vision while being open to changes and taking suggestions. You have to look at this project as a whole, I know that's difficult for some of you, but try to imagine this game as a finished piece. Its narrative integrity wouldn't hold up if it was just NTS scene after NTS scene after NTS scene. Might be hard to imagine, but one day it will be complete and people who play it then will from a logical standpoint be making up a significant part of the total audience, believe it or not.
 

Abra_Ca_Dabra

Newbie
Oct 18, 2024
23
36
Mc x Ammie update is fine, Sax has to keep the uwu vanilla sex, muh reassurance with mc and ammie crowd happy.

Cause look at that brandon update that Sax had to revise cause these people meltdown when they dont get the reassurance that ammie loves the MC and she's doing it for him.
Kid, that was rapey as hell. Only when the MC came she started acting. Does this stuff not fit in your head, or the part of the world you live in has such rules to not see what the woman is feeling at that moment? Do you take woman into a corner just because they act flirty with you and wear such clothes? Ofc he had to change that. Sexual Assault/Rape is not in the tags, nts is.
 

descon456

Newbie
Sep 7, 2024
75
91
Im for one disappointed its an mc x ammie update.. But I guess we have to get some so the story works. Lets hope there is a decent amount of Brandon <3
Don't worry, there is a high chance that Saxo will put an imagination scene (or "What if"? correct me if i'm wrong) , because it has been a while since we have seen one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaden_yuki
4.80 star(s) 56 Votes