3.80 star(s) 129 Votes

DarthSpitz717

Active Member
Mar 28, 2023
565
1,126
Marcel is a big black dick fetish. He told MP that Marcel is a side character. And he won't have a big role in the main plot.
_____________________++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++____________________________________

A bit more than your bbc.... or could be

I suppose the list could be a long and lengthy covering all aspects of bbc

I'm of two minds about the possibility. My first impression is Mr. Palmer really isn't going to go down the whole bbc. It's more an irrational feeling that has me thinking that and one of logic. Does bbc work in the stories over all theme... that's a weak yes and no answer. It could work just on its own mini theme and there is audience/gamer interest in it--but that doesn't seem to be how MP opperates.

The only way bbc works with marcel is if it impacts the other routes and works within the overall story itself. That is my other thought about the whole topic. As a game mechanic unrelated to the characters and story, I like the idea of kill switches that ends an entire path. So, if Anna and Marcel have a fling that would kill off the whole Jake route as an example.

The only real weakness to the whole story is (or it appears to be true) that EVERY male character can and or will have a go at Anna if a players chose all of them. Now if that is so, that's five separate endings on the cheating path for the MCs--what is that...maybe 3 updates to cover them all at a time when the game is winding down?

but if you do have kill switches, one is not so many needed endings. The two, the endings would make more sense. And if say Robinson and Chris are the only ones tapping Anna toward the end if path{A} is chosen, a player can go back and play path{B} just to get the content if they want. Plus having everything running parallel with other content others don't want does get clunky and players endure playing through it but opting out of the tastier bits they want
 
  • Thinking Face
Reactions: Sadowdark

Couto25

Engaged Member
Oct 7, 2023
2,186
5,107
_____________________++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++____________________________________

A bit more than your bbc.... or could be

I suppose the list could be a long and lengthy covering all aspects of bbc

I'm of two minds about the possibility. My first impression is Mr. Palmer really isn't going to go down the whole bbc. It's more an irrational feeling that has me thinking that and one of logic. Does bbc work in the stories over all theme... that's a weak yes and no answer. It could work just on its own mini theme and there is audience/gamer interest in it--but that doesn't seem to be how MP opperates.

The only way bbc works with marcel is if it impacts the other routes and works within the overall story itself. That is my other thought about the whole topic. As a game mechanic unrelated to the characters and story, I like the idea of kill switches that ends an entire path. So, if Anna and Marcel have a fling that would kill off the whole Jake route as an example.

The only real weakness to the whole story is (or it appears to be true) that EVERY male character can and or will have a go at Anna if a players chose all of them. Now if that is so, that's five separate endings on the cheating path for the MCs--what is that...maybe 3 updates to cover them all at a time when the game is winding down?

but if you do have kill switches, one is not so many needed endings. The two, the endings would make more sense. And if say Robinson and Chris are the only ones tapping Anna toward the end if path{A} is chosen, a player can go back and play path{B} just to get the content if they want. Plus having everything running parallel with other content others don't want does get clunky and players endure playing through it but opting out of the tastier bits they want
This VN doesn't make sense the way he's building Ana corruption..First he define 3 paths faithful, unsure and corrupt. Then there are different Antagonist paths where he allows gamers whether to get ANA corrupted on that character path or not. He always warn that if someone doesnt like that particular character, they can reject their moves. Then he choose as per his own choice which antagonist Ana will get sexually involved in the end...it's not on people, it's MP choice. Not all antagonist path will end up with sex. With these 3 things being said. Now just an example...If I like Jake, Tim, Dale, Leonard and Marcel paths..i dont like fake friend, old men and unnecessary character Rob..But MP decided not to lead my antagonist paths to sex. Then whole VN will not make any sense. MP will end the corrupt path forcefully with rob and chris for me or he will show Ana living alone but in got sexually satisfied only with Rob/chris whoever MP wanted .. thats the way he is doing now. And it's just because the way he's creating the game where he does allow gamers to choose which path to choose (faithful/unsure/corrupt) then he allows gamers to choose which antagonist to reject. And in the end, he is the one who choose which antagonist will get close to Ana irrespective of first 2 options. Like if MP want Rob to get close to Ana, then leonard and marcel corrupt storyline will go via Rob as a mediator irrespective of what gamers wanted.
 
Last edited:
  • Thinking Face
Reactions: Sadowdark

AnyName'llDo

Active Member
Feb 12, 2018
637
697
This VN doesn't make sense the way he's building Ana corruption..First he define 3 paths faithful, unsure and corrupt. Then there are different Antagonist paths where he allows gamers whether to get ANA corrupted on that character path or not. He always warn that if someone doesnt like that particular character, they can reject their moves. Then he choose as per his own choice which antagonist Ana will get sexually involved in the end...it's not on people, it's MP choice. Not all antagonist path will end up with sex. With these 3 things being said. Now just an example...If I like Jake, Tim, Dale, Leonard and Marcel paths..i dont like fake friend, old men and unnecessary character Rob..But MP decided not to lead my antagonist paths to sex. Then whole VN will not make any sense. MP will end the corrupt path forcefully with rob and chris for me or he will show Ana living alone but in got sexually satisfied only with Rob/chris whoever MP wanted .. thats the way he is doing now. And it's just because the way he's creating the game where he does allow gamers to choose which path to choose (faithful/unsure/corrupt) then he allows gamers to choose which antagonist to reject. And in the end, he is the one who choose which antagonist will get close to Ana irrespective of first 2 options. Like if MP want Rob to get close to Ana, then leonard and marcel corrupt storyline will go via Rob as a mediator irrespective of what gamers wanted.
While your complaints are fairly valid, it's pretty normal to not have every side character explored in depth. It's not game development studios creating these games, it's horny nerds like us. In the end, throw some cash the developer's way, explain what you want, and you're more likely to get your way than those who are just pirating the game.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Sadowdark

Couto25

Engaged Member
Oct 7, 2023
2,186
5,107
While your complaints are fairly valid, it's pretty normal to not have every side character explored in depth. It's not game development studios creating these games, it's horny nerds like us. In the end, throw some cash the developer's way, explain what you want, and you're more likely to get your way than those who are just pirating the game.
I am not saying to explore all characters path in depth but it's his way of development to show why Ana likes old men and why Ana likes chris n all in depth in slow corruption way..whether you are a member or not, it doesn't matter. He included 3 paths by his choice..then he included different antagonist path allowing members to vote for which antagonist they want to see Ana with...by that time not all antagonist got same screen time with Ana in the story so obviously few got less votes. Neither he covers all antagonist interaction in every updates. maybe that's why Marcel leonard etc might not be a part for many updates. He gave alot of time in developing the storyline in terms of Old men submission with all the reasoning like hank grant marvin, and defining rob character as a neighbour seducer and chris character as best friend cheater. I don't want him to go in that much depth developing storyline of why Ana giving in to them. I would rather want the current story to move forward and all antagonist paths can equally covered to take advantage of Ana. but in the end it's on him, to remove few antagonist who might not get to the final scene with Ana. If he makes corruption so slow per path, it is obviously impossible for him to build scene in all antagonists available in the end so he will keep 4-5 antagonists path up to the tease level only. It has nothing to do with whether you pay him or not lol. In between if you pay him , just a warning the chances that your wishes might not be covered is 90% lol.
 

catgameryt011

Member
Sep 20, 2022
440
702
I am not saying to explore all characters path in depth but it's his way of development to show why Ana likes old men and why Ana likes chris n all in depth in slow corruption way..whether you are a member or not, it doesn't matter. He included 3 paths by his choice..then he included different antagonist path allowing members to vote for which antagonist they want to see Ana with...by that time not all antagonist got same screen time with Ana in the story so obviously few got less votes. Neither he covers all antagonist interaction in every updates. maybe that's why Marcel leonard etc might not be a part for many updates. He gave alot of time in developing the storyline in terms of Old men submission with all the reasoning like hank grant marvin, and defining rob character as a neighbour seducer and chris character as best friend cheater. I don't want him to go in that much depth developing storyline of why Ana giving in to them. I would rather want the current story to move forward and all antagonist paths can equally covered to take advantage of Ana. but in the end it's on him, to remove few antagonist who might not get to the final scene with Ana. If he makes corruption so slow per path, it is obviously impossible for him to build scene in all antagonists available in the end so he will keep 4-5 antagonists path up to the tease level only. It has nothing to do with whether you pay him or not lol. In between if you pay him , just a warning the chances that your wishes might not be covered is 90% lol.
chris is justified, and as much as I don't like his route, another case of the likes of the elderly, this also explains palmer, to feel his pride and satisfy his own self-interest.
And reading again the commentary, I believe that the old ones were the first ones to have a contact with anna in the past, but due to certain inconveniences there was no more of that, chris was later, it was david's turn to introduce chris to anna.
 

Couto25

Engaged Member
Oct 7, 2023
2,186
5,107
chris is justified, and as much as I don't like his route, another case of the likes of the elderly, this also explains palmer, to feel his pride and satisfy his own self-interest.
And reading again the commentary, I believe that the old ones were the first ones to have a contact with anna in the past, but due to certain inconveniences there was no more of that, chris was later, it was david's turn to introduce chris to anna.
I am not against any reasoning that he gave behind any antagonists..how can I explain you this where MP preferred antagonist his own way ...umm lemme give you an example:
Rob and Leonard , both were at same place in the introduction by end of Ch1. Rob did massage in flashback. Ana was hormonal but she got angry. Leonard stole Ana panties..during drunk poker night.. Leonard saw her ass and Ana got angry with him. Leonard saw David with Alexia and Leonard saw Alexia with kendra story wise. That was end of Ch1.

Now as the story moves forward Rob has consistent appearance with Ana via messages, dropping infront of Ana's house. Apologising for his moves, asking to do massage again..in a sense there's alot of Ana/Rob screentime. While Leonard got none. Just recently he made demand to Chris and rob that he wants Ana nude pic and her panties that's all.. It's because MP might not want to develop Leonard/Ana interaction else he could have made interaction between them where Leonard apologising for stealing it as he was drunk and Ana letting things go. And he would have carried corruption path open for Ana directly.

Same way with Jake. He's the biggest exception who made appearance in almost all updates but didn't even touched Ana yet lol even when both of them are attracted to each other. He play different roles in different paths too. But still not close to Ana yet in terms of corruption. Hank, grant, Marvin got an upper hand as comparison to Jake..they groped the fuck Outta Anna in just few appearances lol. Tim and Dale straightforward groped in their first appearance. And Marcel didn't even made an appearance even via texts too where Ana accept him as a trainer.

Now MP asked who do we want to see Ana with the way after he gave few antagonist tease screentime with Ana. Obviously everyone will prefer those characters who actually had made some moves on her or got to the level of some tease with her. And that exactly what happened. And Jake, Leonard even though they got major role story wise were left behind. There was one vote after that too like which antagonist we don't want to see with Ana....in that too Jake, marcel and Leonard got most vote because their storyline didn't reached to that tease level yet.
That's what I am saying like antagonist preference of who gets Ana is on MP and the way he gave screentime to them with Ana and it doesn't matter what others vote or wants. Like if he wants rob to get Ana, then irrespective of Rob not being a part of main storyline and just being a normal neighbour, he will develop so much tease screentime with Rob/ Ana with reasoning that people will vote for Rob and want his storyline to go further.
 
  • Thinking Face
Reactions: Sadowdark

catgameryt011

Member
Sep 20, 2022
440
702
I am not against any reasoning that he gave behind any antagonists..how can I explain you this where MP preferred antagonist his own way ...umm lemme give you an example:
Rob and Leonard , both were at same place in the introduction by end of Ch1. Rob did massage in flashback. Ana was hormonal but she got angry. Leonard stole Ana panties..during drunk poker night.. Leonard saw her ass and Ana got angry with him. Leonard saw David with Alexia and Leonard saw Alexia with kendra story wise. That was end of Ch1.

Now as the story moves forward Rob has consistent appearance with Ana via messages, dropping infront of Ana's house. Apologising for his moves, asking to do massage again..in a sense there's alot of Ana/Rob screentime. While Leonard got none. Just recently he made demand to Chris and rob that he wants Ana nude pic and her panties that's all.. It's because MP might not want to develop Leonard/Ana interaction else he could have made interaction between them where Leonard apologising for stealing it as he was drunk and Ana letting things go. And he would have carried corruption path open for Ana directly.

Same way with Jake. He's the biggest exception who made appearance in almost all updates but didn't even touched Ana yet lol even when both of them are attracted to each other. He play different roles in different paths too. But still not close to Ana yet in terms of corruption. Hank, grant, Marvin got an upper hand as comparison to Jake..they groped the fuck Outta Anna in just few appearances lol. Tim and Dale straightforward groped in their first appearance. And Marcel didn't even made an appearance even via texts too where Ana accept him as a trainer.

Now MP asked who do we want to see Ana with the way after he gave few antagonist tease screentime with Ana. Obviously everyone will prefer those characters who actually had made some moves on her or got to the level of some tease with her. And that exactly what happened. And Jake, Leonard even though they got major role story wise were left behind. There was one vote after that too like which antagonist we don't want to see with Ana....in that too Jake, marcel and Leonard got most vote because their storyline didn't reached to that tease level yet.
That's what I am saying like antagonist preference of who gets Ana is on MP and the way he gave screentime to them with Ana and it doesn't matter what others vote or wants. Like if he wants rob to get Ana, then irrespective of Rob not being a part of main storyline and just being a normal neighbour, he will develop so much tease screentime with Rob/ Ana with reasoning that people will vote for Rob and want his storyline to go further.
I find your observation very interesting.
But I have to lean again to my position, because of all those you mentioned had or had some very persuasive tact with anna, except chris, rob just met anna pregnant and had tact, likewise Leonard who had in his own way, all that happened in his social environment, but at work, they had it approach before david met him, were hanks, jake and marvin, but it seems that he did not give more plot to these in the past, they only wanted anna, jake in his case, was known to have a partner, a reason to stay out of other people's business, hanks as the boss, where also wines that he wants some acceptance like his father, marvin nmnm as marvin, marvin was not given a good development as a character, and if with all this given to conclude that the characters who had that more physical approach, should have the same right that had chris (zzz), marcel, the truth I do not know what motivated him to palmer, but good.
 

Sadowdark

Conversation Conqueror
Mar 4, 2020
7,245
10,443
I find your observation very interesting.
But I have to lean again to my position, because of all those you mentioned had or had some very persuasive tact with anna, except chris, rob just met anna pregnant and had tact, likewise Leonard who had in his own way, all that happened in his social environment, but at work, they had it approach before david met him, were hanks, jake and marvin, but it seems that he did not give more plot to these in the past, they only wanted anna, jake in his case, was known to have a partner, a reason to stay out of other people's business, hanks as the boss, where also wines that he wants some acceptance like his father, marvin nmnm as marvin, marvin was not given a good development as a character, and if with all this given to conclude that the characters who had that more physical approach, should have the same right that had chris (zzz), marcel, the truth I do not know what motivated him to palmer, but good.
But it is not known whether the girl Jake Elizabeth even exists. Anna knew the old fisherman before, when he stubbornly tried to invite her to dinner. But she politely refused, considered him a weirdo and avoided him like the plague whenever she could.
 

sslovoe

Well-Known Member
May 11, 2017
1,104
4,499
If you want the update, come back here on April 1st;) if i can trust what i heard.It'll be the largest update Palmer ever dropped(2000 renders minimum)
bandicam 2025-03-25 23-35-28-186.jpg

we not know how much time need sure he want be new month and one week and day off weekend as usual so possible first week or 2nd sat 5 aprl or 12... hoop not end month
what happen after pause we not know time to post more peek or time release
 
Last edited:

catgameryt011

Member
Sep 20, 2022
440
702
But it is not known whether the girl Jake Elizabeth even exists. Anna knew the old fisherman before, when he stubbornly tried to invite her to dinner. But she politely refused, considered him a weirdo and avoided him like the plague whenever she could.
in quotes existed, which gave anna's idea of having that co-worker environment when she was with jake, in the case of marvin, anna did not consider him a “weirdo” but rather, she did not feel that mere confidence to accept such a request, in retrospect, I think anna's decision to reject was very hasty.
 
3.80 star(s) 129 Votes