- Jan 22, 2018
- 1,092
- 1,492
I once tried to apply my images to the slaves but either I have the wrong folder or it straight up doesn't fucking exist. Once I failed in adding my AI images I kinda gave up trying to use them.
- Thread starter TCMS
- Start date
-
- Tags
- anal sex bdsm big ass big tits character creation dystopian setting exhibitionism female protagonist footjob futa/trans gay group sex handjob harem interracial lactation lesbian male protagonist management masturbation multiple penetration oral sex pregnancy sandbox sci-fi sex toys simulator strategy text based titfuck trainer transformation vaginal sex virgin voyeurism
- Oct 5, 2018
- 770
- 408
A number of other things are shelved until player overhaul is completed or some milestone in the slave maleness overhaul is passed.I don't care about AI image gen and it seems that's the only thing anyone cares about anymore
- Jan 18, 2021
- 409
- 801
Actually, although I gave some advice about AI image generation above, I still prefer the interactive WebGL portraits.I don't care about AI image gen and it seems that's the only thing anyone cares about anymore
I play with WebGL most of the time because I like the ability to modify the poses and the more consistent rendering of the clothes.
- Mar 28, 2020
- 660
- 1,613
For us FCHost plebs it's like it's stored in a blackbox.
I know PregMod stores some things in the Documents folder, but they weren't in mine when I check.
Meh. Guess it's back to WebGL
Wait, I've discovered custom prompting and added in the Loras.
We shall see...
Can always open the saves up on your browser if need be.
I'm not trying to generate 451 pictures again.
I've added a Save Image command to the image context menu in FCHost. You should be able to do this as soon as it gets merged/rebuilt.
- Aug 1, 2020
- 180
- 257
I wonder how big is browser storage to store all those images?
Google search says it's only 15-20MB, which isn't much for high resolution images that take around 400kb each
It's stored in IndexedDB, not in LocalStorage. Most browsers allow at least a couple gigabytes from each origin (Firefox permits 2gb, Safari permits 1gb, Chrome/Edge permit 1/15 of your total disk space).I wonder how big is browser storage to store all those images?
Google search says it's only 15-20MB, which isn't much for high resolution images that take around 400kb each
i feel the need to share this
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
Indeed, that is called 'oppai loli', or at least she'll grow into one in a few years. As for the surgeries, the wonders of future science.i feel the need to share this
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
- Jan 18, 2021
- 409
- 801
The encryption certificate is only valid for gitgud.io, not www. gitgud.io (note: I had to insert a small space to prevent F95 from automatically linking to the wrong address). But the same certificate is used for both addresses. If your browser tries to go to www. gitgud.io, it sees a certificate that does not match the exact name of the site that you requested. This will trigger a warning in Firefox. If you proceed despite the warning, then you will see that www. gitgud.io redirects you to the correct address gitgud.io without the www.im so confused right now
why does this link cause a bad certificate block from my firefox browser:
View attachment 3207474
while this one is completely safe to use:
View attachment 3207477
If you want to check the certificate for gitgud.io in Firefox, you can do that by clicking on the padlock icon next to the address, then clicking on "Connection secure" > "More information". You can then click on the button "View certificate". The first section "Subject Name" will show you that the Common Name is only for gitgud.io. The section "Subject Alt Names" also shows the DNS Name gitgud.io. Alternatively, you can also use a certificate validation tool such as
You must be registered to see the links
and you will see a similar information presented differently.Now if you go to www. gitgud.io, you will also see the exact same certificate that is only valid for gitgud.io, not www. gitgud.io. This causes your browser to complain because the domain name included in the certificate does not match the domain name that you requested.
Last edited:
- Sep 17, 2017
- 4,702
- 13,484
ah i see. thanks for the info!
sadly i still cannot make full use of the new pregmod update. fucking stable diffusion dropped an F bomb at me with their 1.7 update, causing it to not work with my gpu anymore. urrrrrrgh. it was already so fucking difficult to get it to run on an amd gpu, now this crap. fucking hell...
the pain, man.... the pain
i hope pregmod will also allow shark or so in the future. heard thats much better for amd users.
- Jan 22, 2018
- 1,092
- 1,492
The Future Societies aspect really needs some work. A bunch of them just aren't sustainable, causing people to just be funneled into the same set each time.
Physical Idealism, Slimness Enthusiasm, or Hedonistic Decadence? Easy, just keep your sex slaves muscular/skinny/fat, basically self-sustainable. Asset Expansionism and Transformation Fetishism, just pick your favorite body parts and make 'em huge. Paternalism and Slave Professionalism? Just keep your slaves educated and happy.
But other stuff...
Repopulation Efforts is unsustainable. You either have waves of slaves all pregnant at the same time, then suddenly not-pregnant (because birth), casing the FS to crash, or you have a continual stream of babies which means the not-pregnants counterbalance the pregnants causing the FS to be rejected or crash at any moment.
All of the Revivalisms are just as bad. Even with a shop, the assistant dressed for the part, all the slaves dressed properly, all of the advancing Policies, full weekly investments, and propaganda backup all at the same time, most of them will collapse without warning. Antebellum seems to be the only exception, simply because it likes entertainers. The rest just have no positive inputs to use.
The rest are so restrictive that any small deviations will cause implosion, so I hope you're absolutely committed to those respective fetishes. Especially Body Purism. No cybernetics for you, hope you weren't attached to that arm.
As things stand, the only FS's that can be kept are those with no variation of their elements. There's no 'momentum' to carry through brief periods of difference, and one negative is often more impactful than two positives.
Physical Idealism, Slimness Enthusiasm, or Hedonistic Decadence? Easy, just keep your sex slaves muscular/skinny/fat, basically self-sustainable. Asset Expansionism and Transformation Fetishism, just pick your favorite body parts and make 'em huge. Paternalism and Slave Professionalism? Just keep your slaves educated and happy.
But other stuff...
Repopulation Efforts is unsustainable. You either have waves of slaves all pregnant at the same time, then suddenly not-pregnant (because birth), casing the FS to crash, or you have a continual stream of babies which means the not-pregnants counterbalance the pregnants causing the FS to be rejected or crash at any moment.
All of the Revivalisms are just as bad. Even with a shop, the assistant dressed for the part, all the slaves dressed properly, all of the advancing Policies, full weekly investments, and propaganda backup all at the same time, most of them will collapse without warning. Antebellum seems to be the only exception, simply because it likes entertainers. The rest just have no positive inputs to use.
The rest are so restrictive that any small deviations will cause implosion, so I hope you're absolutely committed to those respective fetishes. Especially Body Purism. No cybernetics for you, hope you weren't attached to that arm.
As things stand, the only FS's that can be kept are those with no variation of their elements. There's no 'momentum' to carry through brief periods of difference, and one negative is often more impactful than two positives.
Never had any issues sustaining purism. It doesn't hate cybernetics either, as long as they are replacements for missing limbs and not extra stuff like tails.
- Jan 22, 2018
- 1,092
- 1,492
Wrong, this one is quite easy to do. Simply knocking them up and then slapping pregnancy biometrics on their necks will get you a positive outcome every week. Sounds like someone hasn't been looking at the effects of certain clothing.
They don't like cybernetic limbs, either, be they the highest or the weakest, any replacement parts cause negative reception.
Wrong, I include the Biometrics neclaces in with 'being dressed for the part' (along with maternity attire). Their effect is not enough to prevent a hard crash of the FS, the positive just isn't big enough.
(edit: for numbers, 16 extremely pregnant girls out of 32, everybody wearing biometrics, gets ONE point from the collars. The broodmothers get +15, and everyone not visibly pregnant racks up -32. Everyone not pregnant counts at least twice as hard as a broodmother (30+ babies).)
Last edited: