Words are very important.
You didn't say "there are circumstances where it is legal to drink under the age of consumption". You said:
"Oh excuse me. 3 states have laws that say no exceptions.
Needless to say those laws aren't enforced."
That is a non sequitur logical fallacy - the conclusion doesn't follow the premise.
You also said:
"No, it really doesn't vary state by state.
A resturant cannot serve the minor. There's nothing however stopping a parent from buying and serving it themselves."
Looking through the table at
You must be registered to see the links
, the very first state with an exception to the legal age of 21 is Alaska. It says "Underage drinking allowed for medical purposes, and on private non-alcohol selling premises with parental consent." So, very quickly we're at 4 states who won't allow a parent to buy and serve the underage consumer. Move on to Arizona, Arkansas and California and there are 3 more states (the next 3) that don't allow the minor to consume in a restaurant.
Dude - take some advice - your arguments are full of holes. You really should shore those up. I very easily obliterated one of your statements (the non sequitur), and poked a hole in another of yours. All with minimal research. Do some research, and think before you hit the "POST REPLY" button.