Clearly you have to look at the third little light in the left corner...
I have 1 photorealistic frame rendered in about 90-150 seconds. All 310 frames I would do slowly in a couple of days. You made them in a month and a half. That's what I was talking about.
Obvious, isn't it? Ocean is wanting us to climb the Alps and Everest back to back.
Imagine the world where Daz devs can make ~300 "photorealistic" renders in a couple of daysThank you very much for those words, that's exactly what I was talking about. I have 1 photorealistic frame rendered in about 90-150 seconds. All 310 frames I would do slowly in a couple of days. You made them in a month and a half. That's what I was talking about.
i mean technically you can quite easily... If your name is DPC and have 8 PCs all with 4090s... Then you can do it. But us mere mortals? hah. Good luck with that.Imagine the world where Daz devs can make ~300 "photorealistic" renders in a couple of days![]()
Who laughs? I see that now the whole thread is laughing at you and your nonsense.Ocean has very high-quality female models, but the background is blurred. Several hours per render? Only Ocean said it and you repeat after him. Everyone laughs at these words.
Thank you for another proof that you know nothing about this. It takes several minutes, or even faster, to render without a model and environment. Do you understand what I mean? Simple scene - fast rendering. Complex scene - slower rendering.Anyone can download a program that already has ready-made demo scenes (for example, the Blender that Ocean uses) and try to render it himself. In order not to look for pictures of suitable quality like Ocean's, you can take a photorealistic picture that will be many times better and try to render it, and it will take several minutes and not several hours like you and Ocean. And if a person is lazy, he can go to YouTube and see how long it takes. And then it will immediately be clear that you are lying.
You embarrassed yourself again. Oops:> After these words, I no longer believe that you can render.
And then it will immediately be clear that you are lying.
You were politely pointed out where you are wrong, both from the technical side and from what you wrote about the number of renders. I didn't see myself attacking you or insulting you or anyone else here doing it. Of course Ocean has fans who behave territorially, but most of the crowd here are adequate. Nobody attacked you.Well, you're lying again. I didn’t write to you, you started writing to me and, together with other fanatics, attacked me. Maybe it's better for you to leave yourself and there will be less 1 liar.
"Translation: I AM RIGHT, THE ONLY ONE WHO IS RIGHT! AND EVERYONE WHO DOES NOT AGREE WITH ME YOU ARE CRAZY FANATICS WHO WANT TO CANCEL ME!"This is said by the one who has pronounced fanatic behavior. By the way, when I read the topic that I copied here, fanatics also attacked that person. They also invented facts in the same way and tried to whitewash Ocean by any means.
I guess if your renders are aThank you very much for those words, that's exactly what I was talking about. I have 1 photorealistic frame rendered in about 90-150 seconds. All 310 frames I would do slowly in a couple of days. You made them in a month and a half. That's what I was talking about.
My homie, I usually don't comment but this prompts me to do so. I'm commenting as someone who is using Honey Select 2 which takes like 3 seconds to output a screenshot (which folks call renders, but alright we can roll with it).I completely agree. The main thing is not to mislead people.
Thank you very much for those words, that's exactly what I was talking about. I have 1 photorealistic frame rendered in about 90-150 seconds. All 310 frames I would do slowly in a couple of days. You made them in a month and a half. That's what I was talking about.
I did not work in the Daz 3d program, only in Blender.Imagine the world where Daz devs can make ~300 "photorealistic" renders in a couple of days![]()
Can you provide a scene that you rendered over 2 hours? I'll try to render at least 6x faster and then have a laugh.Who laughs? I see that now the whole thread is laughing at you and your nonsense.
Nah, make your own scene from scratch and it has to be 4K and of the standard in SG. Maybe try a fanart. Clock's ticking.Can you provide a scene that you rendered over 2 hours? I'll try to render at least 6x faster and then have a laugh.
That's the best thing to do,never reply to trolls,Oceanlab
I actually thought you were joking with the 310 renders in one day...
You just disqualified yourself from any technical discussion about Daz rendering... (And it seems like your FPS discussion isn't going any better.)
If you had at least read most of my Dev Logs properly, you wouldn't be saying this bullshit...
As mentioned in many logs before, my SG renders take around 12min - 35min to render... But what can take up to an hour is closing and opening a scene with a lot of characters. (The queue can't force close Daz.)
Chapter 1 Rework had the big college intro scene with tons of people. Loading times in the queue between renders of up to an hour.
Go and create a real game scene with 6 decently morphed characters, a good indoor environment, and several light sources and save the render 10 times under different names and put it in a render queue... Tell me again how long it took you.
Also, make sure your Daz3D library is at least 700GB. Because Daz always loads all morphs and this is what causes the extreme loading times.
But after this post, it's obvious you're either a troll or just plain ignorant.
I won't be replying to you anymore.
technically not wrong. whoever that was just described every VN out there (and some other game genres)I wonder if this is the same guy who was stating stuff like this
![]()
The reason why I then manually add DoF in Ps during post-processing.Erm, just want to add that Geralt does render. He often posts his works on these forum. Decent quality too. However just want to add a slight caveat.. Utilising DoF actually increases render times in many instances. You also use DoF to differentiate what a person should be looking at.
Thank you. I don't usually pay attention to such keyboard diarrhea, but I don't like scammers and liars who pretend to be "professional designers".Not to brown nose Geralt too much or puff up their ego. But from what I have observed they tend to be the more rationally minded individuals when it comes to discussions. Rarely does he go fanatical... Well.. Unless some one disses Sage then you have brought that on yourself.
Can I also get into this dispute?Can you provide a scene that you rendered over 2 hours? I'll try to render at least 6x faster and then have a laugh.