- Apr 8, 2018
- 308
- 951
I hope it's not with the machine anymore.Sid. If I refresh the chat, who will you be talking to?
If I had such a need I would fire up my own chat
If I had such a need I would fire up my own chatNunca viste isto?I hope it's not with the machine anymore.
# We've been through this already. I suppose American Gothic (Zip) is back. If not, someone really really really close related...
- Apr 8, 2018
- 308
- 951
Yes.. this topic is sometimes visited by interesting people. There was a guy here who wanted to pay devs as much as possible because then they would have more time to create, now we have a guy pretending to be a mashine, I saw that Americangothic also looks here but is afraid to comment. Thanks, it would be boring here without you
- Apr 8, 2018
- 308
- 951
no, just one of fans of original Bobby game. I've recreated Bobby's house with some additions, rooms, and etc. They modified it a bit, but I clearly can see prints of my project.
- Apr 8, 2018
- 308
- 951
let me say it again: i've RECREATED bobby's house from orgignal game with additions and shared it with few people. At this game they used it too, but changed soem parts. Take a look at vid.
- Apr 8, 2018
- 308
- 951
Nice work. I asked thtat the original autor o f the game was raince, right?
- Apr 8, 2018
- 308
- 951
No save files in this version, 2 mins of content
Your comment completely misses the point of this discussion. Let me remind you that my original stance (and I emphasize this) was that Zip must have had valid reasons for his behavior. You can't build an audience on promises alone - there needs to be an actual project concept. Zip succeeded in implementing his ideas: he created a game and continued developing it. People subscribed and supported him. Then Zip changed his approach to project development. This is exactly where I argued that people don't just change their minds spontaneously - there must be reasons behind it, potentially difficult life circumstances.
I've been personally accused of moralizing and defending Zip's interests, when in reality the opposite has become clear. This isn't about defending Zip - it's about calling out the morality police. Let me break it down:
This exposition should suffice. However, given the presence of certain "cultivated individuals" within this forum, I anticipate further responses. The necessity of reiterating fundamental concepts for those with reductive interpretations of reality becomes increasingly tedious. Interested parties may examine the complete dialogue thread for comprehensive context
- Attempts to "enlighten" individuals about an alleged "Zip scam" and influence his patrons
- Unsubstantiated allegations of fraud against Zip, relying exclusively on circumstantial evidence
- The infantilization of patrons based solely on lexical and grammatical analysis
- Manifestations of evident discomfort regarding Zip's financial success
- Irrelevant commentary containing incoherent content, invariably infused with moralistic overtones
- Nov 20, 2021
- 97
- 207
If Zip starts changing characters, you'll see the game in 2125 at the earliest ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
There's supposed to be part 4 today according to the release notes
