- Nov 14, 2017
- 70,122
- 35,601
she hates her mother even more than frank does.most likely due to the threat she poses. one word to her mother and everyones live is fucked he is just not ristiking it
she hates her mother even more than frank does.most likely due to the threat she poses. one word to her mother and everyones live is fucked he is just not ristiking it
Nope. There's no way a handjob can be construed as a rape, even if Frank was drugged and tied to the bed (or the shower wall, lol). You might argue sexual harassment, sure, or even maybe sexual assault (I mean, what Abby is doing has strong overtones of harassment, for example, and I guess the way Lilly throws herself at Frank the first time could be construed as sexual assault if you were to dismiss all context), but rape means penetrative sex. Frank can't be "raped" if Becca just touches his dick.it is already rape as soon as its against the victems will. there has to be no threat.
I knew it, you really are a politician. You're making up ever more complicated narratives to suit your chosen theory. Before long, there'll be an entire novel's worth of plots and subplots carefully woven together to prove that the MC was a weak pathetic little victim and Abby his lifelong tormentor.most likely due to the threat she poses. one word to her mother and everyones live is fucked he is just not ristiking it
Being physically capable and mentally capable of doing something are two different things. You could also say that a woman forced to suck on guy's dick "could just bite it off, so if she doesn't then it's not a rape".But he's clearly capable of physically pushing her away and chooses not to.
Wow, there's a lot wrong with this post. First off:Nope. There's no way a handjob can be construed as a rape, even if Frank was drugged and tied to the bed (or the shower wall, lol). You might argue sexual harassment, sure, or even maybe sexual assault (I mean, what Abby is doing has strong overtones of harassment, for example, and I guess the way Lilly throws herself at Frank the first time could be construed as sexual assault if you were to dismiss all context), but rape means penetrative sex. Frank can't be "raped" if Becca just touches his dick.
That is... quite interesting. You may wish to check your dictionary, though (or better yet, change dictionaries), as (a) definition 2 contradicts definition 1, which is kind of stupid, and (b) the best/most-widely regarded dictionaries of the English language (Oxford, Meriam-Webster, Collins) all agree that there has to be intercourse for it to be considered a rape (and so do US and British laws, btw).Wow, there's a lot wrong with this post. First off:
View attachment 4533639
(Notice the second definition?)
Also,You must be registered to see the links
According to Canada's Criminal Code in s. 273.1(1),You must be registered to see the links, otherwise it is considered sexual assault.
Weird. My copy of Merriam-Webster doesn't say intercourse is required. I must have gotten a misprint.That is... quite interesting. You may wish to check your dictionary, though (or better yet, change dictionaries), as (a) definition 2 contradicts definition 1, which is kind of stupid, and (b) the best/most-widely regarded dictionaries of the English language (Oxford, Meriam-Webster, Collins) all agree that there has to be intercourse for it to be considered a rape (and so do US and British laws, btw).
Note, these are just definitions of the word, which include how it's used by people. Having various uses contradict one another isn't exactly unusual -- consider how "literally" gets abused in sentences, e.g.That is... quite interesting. You may wish to check your dictionary, though (or better yet, change dictionaries), as (a) definition 2 contradicts definition 1, which is kind of stupid, and (b) the best/most-widely regarded dictionaries of the English language (Oxford, Meriam-Webster, Collins) all agree that there has to be intercourse for it to be considered a rape (and so do US and British laws, btw).
That is... quite interesting. You may wish to check your dictionary, though (or better yet, change dictionaries), as (a) definition 2 contradicts definition 1, which is kind of stupid, and (b) the best/most-widely regarded dictionaries of the English language (Oxford, Meriam-Webster, Collins) all agree that there has to be intercourse for it to be considered a rape (and so do US and British laws, btw).
Also, if Canada has no provisions for rape, then, by definition, it can't be a rape in Canada either.
(But then, I'm sure you'll agree that even a smidgen of common sense should be enough to realize that there is no way that the shower scene can be considered a rape anywhere on Earth or in the known universe.)![]()
NO! Abby's ass is life love and all that is good in the world, and the universe will die and collapse if Becca's womb is not fertilized immediately.It's just a story, ain't it?
o...kayNO! Abby's ass is life love and all that is good in the world, and the universe will die and collapse if Becca's womb is not fertilized immediately.
i have proof, the doomsday clock has been moved closer to the end of times since the last update.
It's been a couple of in-game weeks, not years.At this point dev is overdoing it with Frank's Uber reluctant attitude...
I mean it's been years so far.. How far is he from this mental block he has to climb over??
abby is not the best girl here the best girl in game is becca !!!!5 years and still no good scenes with Abigail... I feel a little disappointed to be honest, I hope I can see some scenes before I stop playing porn games xd
And it won't happen until CNG leaves Patreon with Single Again and offers his second project on Patreon as an alternative (and Single Again is offered on another platform accordingly).5 years and still no good scenes with Abigail... I feel a little disappointed to be honest, I hope I can see some scenes before I stop playing porn games xd